Radu Murzea
2014-03-06 20:59:57 UTC
Is the GA release date in danger because of this ? Or is it still set in
stone for 18th March ?
On 3/6/2014 10:00 PM, jdk8-dev-request at openjdk.java.net wrote:
> Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 09:33:04 -0800
> From: mark.reinhold at oracle.com
> Subject: JDK 8: Third Release Candidate
> To: jdk8-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Message-ID: <20140306093304.675506 at eggemoggin.niobe.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Last week a critical correctness bug in HotSpot's handling of default
> methods was reported [1], and prior to that we found a JCK failure in
> CORBA [2]. We've fixed both bugs in the third JDK 8 Release Candidate,
> build 132.
>
> Binaries available here, as usual: https://jdk8.java.net/download.html
>
> - Mark
>
>
> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036558
> [2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035618
stone for 18th March ?
On 3/6/2014 10:00 PM, jdk8-dev-request at openjdk.java.net wrote:
> Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 09:33:04 -0800
> From: mark.reinhold at oracle.com
> Subject: JDK 8: Third Release Candidate
> To: jdk8-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Message-ID: <20140306093304.675506 at eggemoggin.niobe.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Last week a critical correctness bug in HotSpot's handling of default
> methods was reported [1], and prior to that we found a JCK failure in
> CORBA [2]. We've fixed both bugs in the third JDK 8 Release Candidate,
> build 132.
>
> Binaries available here, as usual: https://jdk8.java.net/download.html
>
> - Mark
>
>
> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036558
> [2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035618